The
UN And Civil Society Organisations
Background
The UN Charter refers to 'we the peoples', not 'we the governments',
of the United Nations. The door is thus open for NGO participation
in UN debates (though governments decide outcomes), and this has become
a recognised practice. Examples of effective NGO intervention are the
Land Mines Treaty, the ICC and the Convention on Torture.
There is a sharp contrast between the status of NGOs in UN debates
and the lack of such status in parliamentary practice in the UK (though
NGOs may have informal influence).
In the 1990s a wider range of NGOs began to regard the UN as an arena
for action.
The World Civil Society Forum (WCSF) was inaugurated
in Geneva in 2002 (WCSF 1) and in anticipation the WCSF-SG was set
up in 2001 by a number
of UK bodies including the national UNA. The WCSF-SG was represented
at Geneva and now seeks to promote the WCSF in the UK.
WCSF 1 brought together delegates from NGOs
and CSOs (civil society organizations: note the changing, more inclusive,
terminology) from all over the world. WCSF 2 will take place in 2006,
and a preparatory
meeting in July next year.
Kofi
Annan has appointed a High-level Panel on UN-Civil Society Relations(chaired
by the ex-president of Brazil,
Fernando Enrique Cardoso – whom
some may remember as a development economist).
THE CONFERENCE
The main speakers were -
Sebastian Ziegler, Chair of WCSF, and Mamadou Ndiaye, who co-ordinated
the African representation at WCSF 1. A number of issues emerged -
Peter Willetts, Professor of Global Politics at City University, and
a
mine of practical knowledge (much of the above background comes from
his remarks)
Tony Hill, Head of the UN
Non-Governmental Liaison Service, who talked extremely knowledgeably
about the High-level Panel referred
to above. This is more relevant to national level bodies
Keith Hindell, Chair of WCSF-SG,
who introduced the conference and presented the results of a survey
of 3870 UK CSOs as to their present and potential involvement with
the UN. On the evidence of a magnificent
2.6% response rate it was concluded that there was significant
CSO enthusiasm for deeper engagement!
DISCUSSION AND ISSUES
About 50 representatives from a wide range of
CSOs debated the above contributions. Issues identified included -